The Atlas has a standard Automatic Post-Collision Braking System, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The CX-9 doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
When descending a steep, off-road slope, the Atlas 4Motion’s standard Hill Descent Assist allows you to creep down safely. The CX-9 doesn’t offer Hill Descent Assist.
Compared to metal, the Atlas’ plastic fuel tank can withstand harder, more intrusive impacts without leaking; this decreases the possibility of fire. The Mazda CX-9 has a metal gas tank.
Both the Atlas and the CX-9 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, available all wheel drive, lane departure warning systems and around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Volkswagen Atlas is safer than the Mazda CX-9:
|
Atlas |
CX-9 |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
67/229 lbs. |
107/424 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
277 |
337 |
Neck Injury Risk |
39% |
40% |
Neck Stress |
129 lbs. |
183 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
117 lbs. |
165 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
297/97 lbs. |
376/375 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Volkswagen Atlas is safer than the Mazda CX-9:
|
Atlas |
CX-9 |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
57 |
88 |
Abdominal Force |
48 lbs. |
98 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
144 |
208 |
Spine Acceleration |
39 G’s |
54 G’s |
Hip Force |
527 lbs. |
582 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
14 inches |
15 inches |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.